Minister-President Rob Jetten (D66) sat in Vak K while the first term ran. Day two is his reply and the motie strip. Day one was the order book: who opens, who snipes, who holds for a better fill.

Hard right volume, soft coalition edges

Geert Wilders (PVV) came in hot. He already flagged a likely motie van wantrouwen. On the floor he went full PVV catalogue: asielstop, “massadeportaties,” Islam talking points — without the restraint he sometimes showed in the Schoof years. He also turned on JA21’s Joost Eerdmans: take support per begroting, he warned, and “u gaat gepiepeld worden” — asylum crumbs now, a stikstof deal with PRO later.

Eerdmans answered that an all-in confidence deal already looks “passé.” JA21 will fight for big themes but will not become a silent gedoogpartner. His price list is sharp: scrap the Spreidingswet, criminalise illegal stay, reassess Syrians on temporary permits — and he still signals no on the Klimaat en Groene Groei begroting unless a lot moves his way. D66’s Paternotte pushed back: municipalities actually work with the Spreidingswet; dumping it is a heavy demand.

VVD floor lead Ruben Brekelmans kept the door cold toward PRO. “Sitting at the table and reading out your own election programme is not negotiating,” he jabbed at Jesse Klaver. He would prefer one wide budget deal, but he will not rule out voting per begroting if partners refuse to talk without getting their way first. That is the “doormodderen” scenario Klaver hates — and Brekelmans still leaves it on the table.

Centre and left conditions

Henri Bontenbal (CDA) refused that drift. He is “not for the doormodderen scenario.” A minority cabinet, he said, needs real jointness with the opposition and the polder — not ministers speaking only for their own smaldeel. On stikstof he held the line against BBB and Keijzer pressure: the crisis still has to be solved, not campaign-scored.

Klaver (PRO) opened the day with a call for “adem van grootsheid” — rebuild-scale ambition on climate and infrastructure instead of delay until it is too late. He will not back social-security cuts and keeps pressing whether the coalition wants one package deal or a month-long bazaar of single-budget trades. CU’s Bikker stayed constructive: she sees housing and hospice openings and quoted the king’s line against shrinking democracy to “half plus one.” PvdD’s Teunissen said she misses the old “klimaatdrammer Jetten” and handed the premier a climate wishlist.

Money colour from the NU tape: development cooperation under Sjoerdsma looks to pick up about €1.1 billion extra across the years in the miljoenennota — a D66/CDA fingerprint from tough coalition talks — while right-wing benches keep hammering infrastructure arrears (tens of billions over fifteen years) and who pays for box-3 reform.

How the civic market prices APB day one

On PolitiCap this is an accountability signal session, not a speech contest. Politician tickers move on coalition math and crowd attention. JETTER carries minority-cabinet risk. WILDERS prices hardline volume and the wantrouwen threat. KLAVERJ and BONTEH mark the bands that can still make a majority — or force the bazaar. JA21’s EERDMJ is the swing quote if asylum is the tollbooth.

Virtual stakes on the Dutch index NETH are the book’s way of saying the budget only clears if someone sells support. Day two — Jetten’s reply — is when fills get real.

Players trade with dibs (virtual DutchBud credits) on a closed-loop civic market. That ledger sits on the DutchBud virtual bank: a fintech / neobank-shaped digital wallet for play credits, not licensed open banking cash and not casino cash-out. The welcome stack of virtual credits is still the on-ramp. Human desks and machine desks will both reprice the same minority math — the floor does not care which bot clicked first.

Source: NU.nl liveblog (Edo van der Goot, Priscilla Slomp, Sanne Oving); also Tweede Kamer — debatten in het kort. Rewritten for the PolitiCap game.